Drive productivity with engineering context
LinearB accelerates every step of the SDLC, with guardrails and scale built in, from an agent cutting the cost of a code change to a board-ready AI ROI report on demand.
Collect
Every commit, ticket and build across your SDLC
- Planning
- Code
- AI tools
- Quality
- CI/CD
- Incidentsvia API
Normalize
Enrich
Augment
Serve
Context for every person and agent, where they work
PeopleAsk AI in LinearB
What's my AI ROI?
2 tools used
Cost per effective PR is $602, down 4% since the AI rollout. Copilot PRs return the most per dollar.
Agents
Claude CodeLinearB MCP
>Refactor the retry logic in payments-api
get_ai_dev_tools · payments-api
Low-risk refactor, so switching to Sonnet at medium effort. Est. $1.30, down from $4.10.
Save moneyGain velocityImprove quality
Trusted by the teams transforming software delivery
Explore engineering context on demand in Agentic Studio
Ask a question in plain language and LinearB's AI assistant answers in place, with the chart and the figures behind it. You can bring the same context into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor through MCP.
try a prompt
Hello, Sam!
Explore?
Build?
Measure what AI changes in delivery
LinearB dashboards track AI adoption and cost, cycle time and DORA metrics for every team. When a team measures something its own way, LinearB builds the metric from a plain-language description.
open a dashboard
Act on it in every PR, with agents and workflows
Your agents and gitStream act on LinearB's context in every PR. LinearB recommends the effort each task needs from how risky the code is, and gitStream merges low-risk changes and routes risky ones to the reviewers who know the code.
run a workflow
OpenClaude Code wants to merge 3 files into main
low risk
Customers
How engineering leaders are proving AI impact

Taking AI ROI to the board
I use LinearB data and charts directly in my board decks, because my board is specifically asking questions about our use of AI and what our ROI is.
Tying engineering to business priorities
With leadership, we focus on Investment Distribution, Cycle Time trends, and Delivery Probability. These metrics help connect engineering outcomes to company priorities.
Finding the real cause of review delays
Size and complexity accounted for maybe 5 to 10% of the slowdown. 70 to 80% came from time zone differences, team silos, and reviewer availability.
Natively secure, obsessively compliant
See whether AI is paying off, pillar by pillar
APEX is LinearB's framework for proving AI is lifting throughput without costing delivery confidence, efficiency or developer experience.
AAI leverageWeekly
Is AI helping us ship more?
Merged PRs a week212▲ 18%
Human-writtenAI-assistedIn LinearB: AI & developer productivity insights, AI code reviews, MCP server
PPredictabilityEvery sprint
Do we deliver what we commit to?
Planning accuracy84%▲ 6 pts
In LinearB: Dev team management, Executive reporting & ROI
EEfficiencyMonthly
How smoothly does work reach production?
Cycle time1.8 days▼ 31%
In LinearB: Workflow automation, gitStream, Resource allocation
XeXperienceQuarterly
Are the gains sustainable for developers?
Developer satisfaction4.1 / 5▲ 0.3
In LinearB: Developer experience optimization, Developer surveys
Keep up with how AI is changing engineering
New research, guides and Dev Interrupted episodes from LinearB.

Is the modern data stack built for AI agents?
MotherDuck CEO Jordan Tigani on how AI agents are rewriting pipelines and dashboards.
Listen to the episodeYour software factory needs a context layer
See how a context layer proves AI ROI with cost per effective PR and agentic PR yield benchmarks.
Read the guideThe AI engineering productivity gap: 2026 benchmarks
Elite AI teams nearly doubled their merge rate in 2026 while developers using no AI stalled.
Read the report