Improvement Engine (LinearB) vs. Reports Collection (waydev)
Complicated reports full of passive metrics and basic alerting won’t deliver operational excellence or better business outcomes. Engineering teams looking to actively improve choose LinearB because it:
Highlights project delivery risk with leading indicator metrics
Quantifies engineering impact and alignment to business priorities
Reduces cycle time by an average 44% with workflow automation
Uses Engineering Benchmarks to show how your metrics stack up to the industry
R&D Leaders trust LinearB to improve the ROI of their investments
Why Choose LinearB Over waydev
Workflow Automation
In-App Benchmarks
PR-Policy-As-Code
Live Chat Support
In-App Recommendations
Improvement Playbooks
Reporting on Custom PM Fields
Ability to Use ANY Tool
Cost Capitalization
waydev
Top 5 Reasons People Choose LinearB Over waydev
Complex Reporting Won’t Help You Improve
The ability to “build complex reports” isn’t how you improve your engineering team’s efficiency or help them align to business priorities.
Those results are achieved with industry standard benchmarks, programmable delivery pipelines, and executive level resource allocation and cost capitalization reporting.
LinearB provides those capabilities. waydev doesn’t.
We correlate data across your tools to identify bottlenecks and automate developer workflow optimization.
Documentation
Learn how LinearB metrics can help you improve work breakdown and reduce cycle time, change failure rate, and mean time to restore.
Read LinearB Documentation
Blog
Explore the details of software delivery excellence, PR workflows, and how to persuade the boardroom as an engineering leader.
Read the LinearB Blog
Podcast
With 13,000+ community members, Dev Interrupted is your weekly source for what engineering leaders are thinking, doing, & solving.
Listen to the Dev Interrupted Podcast