Active Improvement (LinearB) vs. Passive Metrics (Jellyfish)
Metrics alone don’t improve teams or drive the business forward. Engineering teams love LinearB because it goes beyond passive metric dashboards to help teams actively improve with:
Workflow automation that results in an average 44% reduction in cycle time
Self-service flexibility for project and resource allocation reporting
R&D Leaders trust LinearB to improve the ROI of their investments
Why Choose LinearB Over Jellyfish
Self-Service Project and Team Configuration
Streamlined PR Process
Project Delivery Forecasting
Live Chat Support
Engineering Improvement Playbooks
Guidance and Templates for Exec Reports
Top 5 Reasons People Choose LinearB Over Jellyfish
Dashboards Don't Improve Dev Team Efficiency
When it comes to LinearB vs. Jellyfish, the differences are clear:
Self-service Project Configuration: Don’t wait on a Jellyfish to change your resource allocation project configuration or build your teams - do it yourself with tools like automated team configuration and see real-time results.
Improvement Playbooks & Industry Benchmarks: Understand how your team’s performing and implement playbooks for systematic improvement.
We correlate data across your tools to identify bottlenecks and automate developer workflow optimization.
“It’s always been difficult to understand where work is stuck across JIRA and GitLab. LinearB shows us the big picture and democratizes the facts so it’s actually actionable.”
VP of Engineering
Learn how LinearB metrics can help you improve work breakdown and reduce cycle time, change failure rate, and mean time to restore.
Read LinearB Documentation
Explore the details of software delivery excellence, PR workflows, and how to persuade the boardroom as an engineering leader.
Read the LinearB Blog
With 13,000+ community members, Dev Interrupted is your weekly source for what engineering leaders are thinking, doing, & solving.
Listen to the Dev Interrupted Podcast