On-Demand Workshop
Life beyond tokenmaxxing: AI efficiency for the long term
Your CFO isn't interested in AI adoption anymore. Now they're asking what your investment in AI has produced. The metrics that got you through the last budget cycle - including adoption rates, token consumption, and seats activated - ring hollow in executive conversations now.
The problem isn't the strategy; it's the evidence. Your team's generating more code than ever before, but everything downstream runs at the same speed it always has - or slower. The system is lopsided, and the only way to make the imbalance visible is to measure it.
Join Andrew Zigler and Ben Lloyd Pearson for a 45-minute session on the operational measurement model engineering leaders are using to answer board-level ROI questions about AI. You'll see why effort metrics around token consumption and lines of code don't tell the full story, how AI shifted bottlenecks across the SDLC, and how APEX, LinearB's measurement framework for the AI era, gives you the system-level evidence executives have started demanding.
Watch On-Demand
Speakers
Andrew Zigler
GTM Engineer, LinearB
Ben Lloyd Pearson
Senior Director, AI & Product Marketing, LinearB
Your next read
Guide
Six questions to ask your engineering data
Six playbooks you can run through the LinearB MCP server to find who is carrying your review load, how long agent work waits and where the hours spill over.
Guide
Four signals your team is absorbing AI's hidden cost
When AI output outpaces your process, your engineers absorb the difference in heavier review loads, constant context switching and weekend work. Here are the...
Guide
The AI code review bottleneck: why AI code waits 5x longer
AI-generated pull requests wait 5.3x longer for review and are accepted at 32.7% against 84.4% for human code. See where the review load lands in your data,...